Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon Dating | NCSE
Radiocarbon dating has been used to determine of the ages of ancient atmosphere is threatening to skew the accuracy of this technique for. Radiocarbon dating uses the naturally occurring isotope Carbon to Though radiocarbon dating is startlingly accurate for the most part. Radiocarbon dating, which is used to calculate the age of certain organic materials, has been found to be unreliable, and sometimes wildly so.
New Carbon is produced at a steady rate in Earth's upper atmosphere, however, as the Sun's rays strike nitrogen atoms.
Radiocarbon dating exploits this contrast between a stable and unstable carbon isotope. During its lifetime, a plant is constantly taking in carbon from the atmosphere through photosynthesis. Animals, in turn, consume this carbon when they eat plants, and the carbon spreads through the food cycle. This carbon comprises a steady ratio of Carbon and Carbon When these plants and animals die, they cease taking in carbon.
From that point forward, the amount of Carbon in materials left over from the plant or animal will decrease over time, while the amount of Carbon will remain unchanged.
Radiocarbon dating - Wikipedia
To radiocarbon date an organic material, a scientist can measure the ratio of remaining Carbon to the unchanged Carbon to see how long it has been since the material's source died. Advancing technology has allowed radiocarbon dating to become accurate to within just a few decades in many cases. Carbon dating is a brilliant way for archaeologists to take advantage of the natural ways that atoms decay.
Unfortunately, we aren't able to reliably date artifacts beyond several thousand years. Scientists have tried to extend confidence in the carbon dating method further back in time by calibrating the method using tree ring dating. Unfortunately, tree ring dating is itself not entirely reliable, especially the "long chronology" employed to calibrate the carbon dating method.
The result is that carbon dating is accurate for only a few thousand years. Anything beyond that is questionable.
Thanks to Fossil Fuels, Carbon Dating Is in Jeopardy. One Scientist May Have an Easy Fix
This fact is born out in how carbon dating results are used by scientists in the scientific literature. Many scientists will use carbon dating test results to back up their position if the results agree with their preconceived theories.
But if the carbon dating results actually conflict with their ideas, they aren't too concerned.Carbon Dating Flaws
The answer to the problem of fluctuating amounts of this important isotope is calibration. Standard calibration curves are now used for more accurate readings. These curves indicate the changes in Carbon throughout the years and modifies the end result of the tests to reflect that.
Though the calibrated date is more precise, many scholars still use the uncalibrated date in order to keep chronologies consistent in academic communities.
As the lecture detailed, it is only accurate from about 62, years ago to 1, A. There is a sizable amount of time before and after that period that cannot be investigated using this method.
Also, archaeologists cannot use their hands to touch the samples or smoke near them. They risk seriously altering the result of the test.
- Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon-14 Dating
- Research illuminates inaccuracies in radiocarbon dating
- Radiocarbon Dating: A Closer Look At Its Main Flaws
If an archaeologist wanted to date a dead tree to see when humans used it to build tools, their readings would be significantly thrown off.