Facebook identity theft: My profile was stolen to get dates on Tinder - Telegraph
ATLANTIC CITY -- It was a simple case of mistaken identity, and it nearly cost a banned gambler stay overnight, rescinded the penalty Wednesday, with the same address; one had Casso's date of birth and other personal. proposed policy for bans and blocks for the en:wikipedia. . so that in cases of mistaken identity the new user can quickly set us straight (see. Related Stories. Shooting death of Surrey father was case of 'mistaken identity': IHIT false. She's banned from Twitter for her views on transge.
The explosion of social media has made it easier than ever before for fraudsters to piece together false personas from details and photos posted online. The security issues surrounding this type of identity theft can be wide ranging. But the scammers often use bots software that can answer questions with automated responses to steal your information known as phishingsend you to external sites to get you to sign up for services - or initiate contact with people looking for a date.
Identity theft is on the rise, thanks to the social media explosion Alamy Lana quickly learnt that, when it comes to identity theft on social networks and dating applications, consumer protection is far more lax than that for lost or stolen credit cards. Here, banks are obliged to cover costs incurred as a result of fraud.
- Shooting of B.C. hockey dad in driveway was case of mistaken identity: police
- My Facebook profile was stolen to get dates on Tinder - and there's nothing I can do
- 5 Ways To Get Banned From Facebook
As a result, they carefully monitor accounts, block cards and contact customers when spending patterns change and they suspect fraudulent use. The same protection is not afforded to the victims of imposter online accounts. As a result, critics have said there is little incentive for the technology companies to target fraudsters who are illegally using the identities of its users, because their profits are unaffected.
And while some social media sites have introduced methods to combat revenge porn - following a new law to criminalise it in England and Wales - it seems that, when it comes to identity theft, the burden of proof lies with the victim. Lana was told she had to identify the accounts before either social media platform would investigate. What can you do to protect yourself from fraudsters looking to steal your online identity?
'Something's happened to dad': Surrey widow recalls mistaken identity shooting
How can you stop someone from stealing your Facebook profile? Social media websites change their privacy settings often, so make sure you keep an eye on all updates to policies - this is vital for protecting yourself. In order to keep as much of your data as private as possible, ensure your privacy settings are limited to 'friends' only and your information is not searchable. Use any options that allow you to 'limit old posts' being on view. You can also monitor to what degree you wish others to be able to find you, including via search engines.
Bans and blocks/old
A useful test is to log out of all of your accounts and then view them using the domain address to check what is actually on public display.
Good edits - mostly reverted, but some may be kept at our discretion, or moved to the user's talk page Bad edits - reverted, or moved to the user's talk page Talk edits - at user's discretion The decision to soft ban someone is, like most decisions on Wikipedia, a consensus one made by the community as a whole.
If the community decides to soft ban a user, the following text should be placed on the user page of a soft banned user, to inform them of their soft ban: This user is under a [[wikipedia: All edits by this user may be reverted, though they do not have to be.
You may reinstate good edits by this user if you wish. If you wish to act as a character witness for a soft banned user, you should do so there. However, the best way to get a soft ban lifted is for the banned user to take on board the feedback they've been given, and make only good edits.
Soft bans are reviewed roughly once a month, and may be lifted depending on behaviour. If you see a good edit by a soft banned user, you are free to reinstate it. However, please do not reinstate bad edits, and check before reinstating an edit. For example, if a user has been soft banned for continuing to misunderstand or misapply the en: Hard ban[ edit ] Users who do not improve in conduct after being placed under a soft ban may be placed under a hard ban.
All edits by a hard banned user, regardless of their merits, will be reverted.
In addition, hard banned users may face technical measures to prevent them editing Wikipedia. The following text should be placed on the user's page by Jimbo, or a representative: All edits by this user will be reverted. Please do not reinstate any edits made by this user.
Hard banned users may be unbanned following: Three consecutive months of good behaviour The banned user requesting unbanning by emailing Jimbo Wales Good behaviour includes but is not limited to not posting to any part of the Wikipedia project including under pseudonyms and not threatening Wikipedia contributors. The following text is suitable for a user who has respected their hard ban for three months. This user was [[wikipedia: The user is welcome to return to Wikipedia, but first they must email [[user: Jimbo Wales ]] to discuss the issues.
NAME, DATE Users who are unbanned will be on parole - if they start making the same mistakes that lead to their previous ban they are likely to be swiftly soft banned again, and this may lead to another hard ban.Why Dr. Phil Abruptly Ends Interview And Asks Guest To Leave Stage
Equally, they can only be removed by him. Historical bans[ edit ] Some users were banned by Jimbo before the formulation of this policy. These users are hard banned, judging from Jimbo's comments, so a hard ban boilerplate text is appropriate. Newly created articles[ edit ] It is not possible to revert newly created articles, as there is nothing to revert to. In the case of soft bans, listing the page on votes for deletion is the appropriate action—this allows a user who wishes to reinstate the page and check it for accuracy or neutrality to do so.
In the case of hard bans, sysops can simply delete the page without listing it on votes for deletion. If someone else has edited the page, deletion is generally not appropriate. Try instead to edit the page to remove or refactor content contributed by the banned user, and keep content conributed by others.
If you feel a newly created article may have been deleted in error, list it on wikipedia: For example, you might list a page if you think it's a case of mistaken identity, or where the classification of a banned user between soft-banning and hard-banning is controversial.
reddit: the front page of the internet
Reincarnations[ edit ] Wikipedians should generally refrain from witch hunts of users who may be older users coming back under a new name. It's probably reasonable to politely ask, though, so that in cases of mistaken identity the new user can quickly set us straight see below for some of the many kinds of evidence one could use to do this. If the community consensus is that a new user is probably the reincarnation of an old user, the community may soft ban that user, as described above.